San Mateo · Licensed center

Bright Horizons at San Mateo

What the state has found

The state cited rules at 1 of its 5 licensing inspections under this license since January 2023.

Of the 98 Bay Area centers with 5 licensing inspections, 40% had rules cited at 1 of them, as this center did. 20% had none cited.

Licensing inspections

Jun 30, 2026No rules cited
Jun 9, 20261 citation
  • “(b) The person who brings the child to, and removes the child from, the center shall sign the child in/out. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in 5 out of 57 children present today, which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.”

    CCR 101229.1(b)

Sep 18, 2025No rules cited
Aug 19, 2024No rules cited
Jan 13, 2023No rules cited
Read every record and the state’s reports

State record — California CDSS Community Care Licensing

Last visit
August 20, 2026
On file
5 visits since January 2023 — 4 cited nothing · 4 complaint investigations
Most serious
Type B — (b) The person who brings the child to, and removes the child from, the center shall sign the child in/out. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in 5 out of 57 children present today, which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. · June 9, 2026

California CDSS publishes the full investigation narrative for a complaint, including its disposition, and classifies a citation Type A — an immediate risk to a child — or Type B.

Jun 2026 Licensing visit nothing cited
Jun 2026 Complaint Unsubstantiated

Complaint · June 26, 2026

Unsubstantiated

ALLEGATION(S): -Staff are not ensuring adequate staffing to operate within ratio -Staff are not ensuring adequate staffing to meet the toileting needs of children in care. INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: On August 20, 2026, at approximately 12:15PM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) T. and Alvarado conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit at the facility. LPAs met with Director L.M. and explained the purpose of the visit. Present during the visit were 8 staff and 54 preschool age children. During the course of the investigation, site observations, interviews, and record reviews were conducted. During site visits, LPAs observed the facility to be operating within ratio requirements. Based on record review, qualifications of teachers employed at the facility were verified. Sign-in sheets and teacher schedules were reviewed. There is no direct evidence to support or deny the above allegations. Based on relevant information reviewed, although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated at this time. A notice of site visit was provided and must remain posted for 30 days. Exit interview was conducted and report was reviewed with Director, L.M. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:

State report

Jun 2026 Licensing visit 1 finding

Licensing visit · June 9, 2026

CCR 101229.1(b) · Type B

(b) The person who brings the child to, and removes the child from, the center shall sign the child in/out. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in 5 out of 57 children present today, which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

State report

May 2026 Complaint Unsubstantiated

Complaint · May 5, 2026

Unsubstantiated

ALLEGATION(S): Staff left daycare child in soiled diaper for a period of time. INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: On June 9, 2026, at approximately 9:10AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) J.T. conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit at the facility. LPA met with Director L.M. and explained the purpose of the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted site observations, record review, and interviews with relevant parties. LPA did not observe children to be left in soiled diapers. LPA observed staff taking children to the bathroom for toileting needs. Based on interviews, classes have a routine where they are taken to the bathroom on a regular basis. There is no direct evidence to support or deny the above allegation. Based on relevant information reviewed, although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated at this time. A notice of site visit was provided and must remain posted for 30 days. Exit interview was conducted and report was reviewed with Director, L.M. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:

State report

Apr 2026 Complaint Unsubstantiated

Complaint · April 25, 2026

Unsubstantiated

ALLEGATION(S): -Facility is operating out of ratio INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: On June 9, 2026, at approximately 9:10AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) J.T. conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit at the facility. LPA met with Director L.M. and explained the purpose of the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted site observations, record review, and interviews with relevant parties. LPA did not observe the facility to be operating out of ratio. Based on record review, LPA observed that teachers stationed in each classroom have units and are qualified as teachers. Interviews indicated that there are methods of communication (walkie talkies/telephones) that can be used by teachers to request assistance to meet ratios. There is no direct evidence to support or deny the above allegation. ***Continued on Page Two*** Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:

State report

Sep 2025 Licensing visit nothing cited
Aug 2024 Licensing visit nothing cited
Jan 2023 Licensing visit nothing cited

Shortlist replaces people’s names in the state’s text with initials. This is done by rule, not by hand, so it can miss a name or shorten a word that isn’t one. The state’s report, linked on each row, has the original.

Openings, child care subsidies, cost, hours and late pickup, teaching approach, ratios and staff, a typical day, and sick and biting policies aren’t on this page.

Details

(650) 844-6460

Address
1700 Alameda De Las Pulgas
License
414004968, active
Chain
Bright Horizons
Owner
Public shareholders (NYSE: BFAM)

The state licenses this address more than once, to the same licensee.

The infant-center license is published separately, with its own license and its own inspection record:

Bright Horizons at San Mateo

Run Bright Horizons at San Mateo? Correct or add anything here, free.

Add what is missing
Sources and dates

Where every fact on this page came from, and when Shortlist last checked it against that source. Anything Shortlist could not source is named here rather than left blank.

State record

The state’s licensing transparency data reports 6 complaint-related visit(s) to this facility, while 3 complaint investigation report(s) are published on the transparency portal. State complaint counts: substantiated=0, inconclusive=0, unsubstantiated=4, unfounded=CONFIDENTIAL, Type A citations=0, Type B citations=0. The state publishes no further detail for the difference.

From California CDSS Community Care Licensing’s published reports, last checked October 10, 2026.

Details

Bright Horizons is a public company. Its annual report to the SEC for 2025 (Form 10-K, filed February 2026) lists its common stock on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol BFAM. sec.gov

Medium means the middle half of Bay Area’s 439 licensed centers by state-licensed capacity: 31 to 75 children. Small is 8 to 30; large is 76 to 312.